Archive for June, 2009

On July 17th 2008, the .ME domain extension was unleashed unto the domaining world. There is a great deal of hype and demand when any new domain extension is released and, with the domaining industry continuing to grow, it wasn’t a huge surprise when .ME started to break records set by previously released extensions. GoDaddy, arguably the biggest domain registrar in the world, had been heavily marketing .ME in the build-up to its release. But even they failed to predict the enormity of the demand as their website buckled under the pressure, with buyers - myself included - rushing to snap up .ME domains in record-breaking numbers.

Not only did .ME prove to be record-breaking in terms of public sales, it also generated over $2million from the landrush auction period alone. It achieved the fastest growth of sites on a particular extension being indexed by Google - .ME domains now account for almost ten million of Google’s indexed pages - and Alexa reported that the number of .ME domains in its top 1million websites was soaring past the corresponding numbers for .MOBI and .ASIA domains, both of which extensions had been released some time before .ME. It was the fastest growing new domain extension on record.

So what’s so special about .ME?

Whenever a new extension is released, domain buyers flock to snap up domains regardless of what the extension is – be it .ME, .YOU, .CHEESE or .LIPSTICK – because some domains are of a certain value irrespective of their extension. The type of domains I’m referring to are keyword domains. For example, carinsurance.biz, tailoredsuits.info, or cheapflights.com. The value of these domains is in the volume of searches for the respective keywords via search engines; your potential customers are already searching for your website. It’s a bit like hiring premises for a shop on a busy high street – your potential customers are already on the high street, waiting to buy your products. Since there are a limited number of domain extensions, there are subsequently a limited number of domains that can be registered with any particular keyword. So the supply of a keyword domain is very small, but demand is huge – hence domainers flocking to snap up these types of domain whenever a new extension is released.

But .ME is not just any extension. While it has the same value as other extensions for keyword domains, it also has meaning. “Me” is, of course, a word – not just in English, the most spoken language across the globe, but also in Spanish and Italian. So you can juxtapose a verb with “me” to create catchy phrases – particularly call-to-action phrases – with a .ME domain. The possibilities are almost endless – this method of creating a phrase with a .ME domain can be applied to any industry. Some examples of this are “insure.me”, “date.me” and “entertain.me”. This type of domain is catchy, unique and, most importantly, easier to remember than other types of domain. This is firstly because they stand out, since most other domains are not catchy phrases. But secondly – and here is where I dip into my HCI knowledge – there is a science behind the memorability of these types of domain. This science is called ‘chunking’. Chunking, in a nutshell, is the way in which information is split into chunks that are manageable by the human mind. In other words, it is the way in which things are made easy to remember. Most websites use the more common extensions such as .COM, .NET and .INFO. In most cases, the domain does not comprise a phrase. When a user sees one of these domains, they have two chunks of information to remember – the domain name and the domain extension, e.g. “google” and “dot com”. Let’s look at a brandable .ME domain, however. The example we will use is “insure.me”. When the user sees this domain, they see a phrase - “insure me”. The user will, of course, have to remember both the domain and the extension. But the second word IS the extension and the two words collocate to form one phrase, meaning that the user effectively has just one chunk of information – the phrase “insure me” - to remember. This acts to constrict the amount of information processed by the user’s brain, thus making the domain significantly easier to remember. Some examples of websites already using this technique with other domain extensions are fly.be, buy.at and del.icio.us.

Right, now that I’ve had my HCI fix, it’s time for my entrepreneurial fix - let’s talk about brands. Every business needs a brand – it’s what its customers remember and refer to it by. If a business is web-based, its domain is of huge importance – it goes hand in hand with its brand and is paramount to its marketing. If I ask you to think of the first three successful websites that come into your head, which ones do you think of? My answer would be Google, Ebay and Amazon. Now think of their domain names – how many are keyword domains? In this case, none of them. Keyword domains have their value but, if you have big ambitions for your website, you need a real, strong brand. Google’s domain is not “searchengine.com”, Ebay’s domain is not “onlineauctions.net” and Amazon’s domain is not “bookshop.biz”. They did not choose to pick up a keyword domain and just sit and wait for some search engine traffic. They made names for themselves by creating their own memorable brands and standing out from the crowd. This is what .ME is all about. But why not create a catchy, memorable .COM domain instead? You could argue that most successful websites, like these examples, use .COM domains, so the web address is usually obvious. In which case, if you are able to come up with a catchy and memorable brand name, would a .COM not be better than a .ME? This can sometimes be the case, but not always. What’s more, all the good names are taken! Think SourceForge (.net), Craigslist (.org) or ImageShack (.us) - other domain extensions are coming into play more and more, so it is becoming increasingly important that your domain extension is obvious. Enter .ME – the perfect solution. Not only does it ooze potential for creating catchy, memorable domain names – it is also the most effective extension for allowing your website name to double up as your web address. No other domain extension can truly rival the marketing potential of .ME.

So, to answer the question - “what’s so special about .ME?” - it is a domain extension that gives you more potential than any other to create a unique, memorable domain name that stands out from the crowd. Dot com may always be king, as they say. But, in an industry that is becoming increasingly competitive for getting your website seen and found, no other domain extension manages to encapsulate the needs of the modern day website owner quite like .ME does. Don’t get me wrong – having a good, brandable .ME domain does not guarantee that your website will be successful, no matter how catchy or memorable it is. But it will give you a head start. If you have big ambitions for your website - and you really want to make a name for yourself - then .ME is for you.

Add This! Blinkbits Blinklist Blogmarks BlogMemes BlueDot BlogLines co.mments Connotea del.icio.us de.lirio.us Digg Diigo DZone Facebook FeedMeLinks Folkd.com Fleck Furl Google Google Reader icio.de IndianPad Leonaut LinkaGoGo Linkarena Linkter Magnolia Mister Wong MyShare Ask.com MyStuff Ask.com Yahoo! MyWeb Netscape Netvouz Newsgator Newsvine Oneview.de RawSugar reddit Rojo Segnalo Shadows Simpy SlashDot Smarking Sphere Spurl Startaid StumbleUpon TailRank Technorati ThisNext yigg.de Webnews.de ReadMe.ru Dobavi.com Dao.bg Lubimi.com Ping.bg Pipe.bg Svejo.net Web-bg.com Plugin by Dichev.com
28 Jun 2009

Why .ME?

Author: Adam | Filed under: Business, Domains, HCI

Just thought I’d share with you my favourite font finding resource - Abstract Fonts. This website currently contains over 12,000 free fonts - that’s a lot of free fonts! You can browse them in various ways; randomly, by how new they are, by how popular they are, or by my favourite method, which is by category. This way you can find just the type of font you are looking for, be it graffiti, floral, calligraphy, retro or whatever else.

Hope you find it useful - I do!

Add This! Blinkbits Blinklist Blogmarks BlogMemes BlueDot BlogLines co.mments Connotea del.icio.us de.lirio.us Digg Diigo DZone Facebook FeedMeLinks Folkd.com Fleck Furl Google Google Reader icio.de IndianPad Leonaut LinkaGoGo Linkarena Linkter Magnolia Mister Wong MyShare Ask.com MyStuff Ask.com Yahoo! MyWeb Netscape Netvouz Newsgator Newsvine Oneview.de RawSugar reddit Rojo Segnalo Shadows Simpy SlashDot Smarking Sphere Spurl Startaid StumbleUpon TailRank Technorati ThisNext yigg.de Webnews.de ReadMe.ru Dobavi.com Dao.bg Lubimi.com Ping.bg Pipe.bg Svejo.net Web-bg.com Plugin by Dichev.com
25 Jun 2009

Abstract Fonts - lots and lots of free fonts!

Author: Adam | Filed under: Web Design, Websites

Another random post. This one’s about Spotify, the latest music website/program/thingy that everyone’s talking about. Let me just start by clarifying that I love Spotify - it’s a great idea and I’m a big fan. But the reason I’m writing this post is because I just had to have a good old rant. Not about Spotify itself, nor the fact that you have to put up with ads if you choose the free option, but about the ads themselves.

I don’t know how much money Spotify are making but it seems to be taking off somewhat, judging by how much I keep hearing about it all over the place. So I’m going to assume that they’re doing ok for cash. In which case, could they not afford to have their own ads done a bit more professionally? I find the ones that start with “Hi, I’m Joe Bloggs from Spotify, we hope you love Spotify as much as we do”, and finish with “everyone loves music”, pretty annoying and borderline patronising. But I can just about tolerate these. It’s the latest batch that have irked me.

First off we have Dave Berry - or at least it sounds like Dave Berry. He’s a pretty successful radio DJ from XFM in London. He’s done loads of voiceovers - I hear him on adverts all the time. And, as I mentioned above, I’m assuming Spotify are doing alright for cash. So why are both Dave Berry’s Spotify ads so unbelievably rubbish? They’re poorly scripted, poorly voiced and the audio quality is AWFUL. Seriously, they must have got the microphone in a Christmas cracker and then said “just make something up for 30 seconds Dave, anything will do”.

And secondly, the voicemail adverts. Ah yes, phone Spotify’s voicemail and leave a message - tell them what you think of Spotify. That’s all fine, the idea itself is not overly offensive. But what occured to me when hearing one of these ads just now was that each advert is the same duration - around 30 seconds. The Spotify bit (the guy saying “leave us a voicemail on 0207…” etc) is the same duration every time - it’s the same recording. And the adverts are always the same duration. So the first half of the advert - the voicemail left by a Spotify user - has a set duration. My question is, does everyone who calls their voicemail just happen, by coinsidence, to speak for exactly the same duration of time? And, by another freak coinsidence, is this duration of time the exact same duration of time that the voicemails in their adverts must last for? The cynic in me suggests that this is more than a coinsidence and that the ‘voicemails’ they have put in their adverts are faked.

Like I said, I’m all in favour of Spotify - it’s brilliant. I just find Spotify’s own adverts to be pretty irritating in various ways - I just wanted to have a quick rant about it.

Ah, now I feel better :-)

Add This! Blinkbits Blinklist Blogmarks BlogMemes BlueDot BlogLines co.mments Connotea del.icio.us de.lirio.us Digg Diigo DZone Facebook FeedMeLinks Folkd.com Fleck Furl Google Google Reader icio.de IndianPad Leonaut LinkaGoGo Linkarena Linkter Magnolia Mister Wong MyShare Ask.com MyStuff Ask.com Yahoo! MyWeb Netscape Netvouz Newsgator Newsvine Oneview.de RawSugar reddit Rojo Segnalo Shadows Simpy SlashDot Smarking Sphere Spurl Startaid StumbleUpon TailRank Technorati ThisNext yigg.de Webnews.de ReadMe.ru Dobavi.com Dao.bg Lubimi.com Ping.bg Pipe.bg Svejo.net Web-bg.com Plugin by Dichev.com
14 Jun 2009

Spotify adverts

Author: Adam | Filed under: Miscellaneous

Time for a random post. I’m hoping this will prove useful to some people as I couldn’t find anything on Google for the life of me when I tried to figure out the answer to the problem.

I purchased a Blackberry Bold a few months back and have been experiencing a problem with the screen going blank at random. From time to time, it just seems to go into standby randomly and the only way I could get the screen to come back on was to shake it. I searched the web like crazy and found nothing - and pretty much everyone I know who has a Blackberry (either Blackberry Bold or Blackberry Storm) has been experiencing the same problem. However, I have finally figured it out.

When you put your Blackberry into its case, there is a magnet inside the case that the Blackberry detects. It then automatically goes into standby in order to prevent any buttons being inadvertently pressed if you lean on it while it’s in your pocket.

What I found was that the screen was going blank when I was holding the Blackberry against the case - so it was obviously detecting the magnet and thinking that it was inside the case, hence going into standby. It wasn’t the shaking that got the screen to come back on - it was simply pulling the Blackberry away from the case!

So that’s it. I hope there’s some people out there who read this post and find that it solves the problem for them - I know how infuriating it is! Thankfully I never got round to sending my Blackberry back to Vodafone to get it repaired - I may have looked a bit silly…

Add This! Blinkbits Blinklist Blogmarks BlogMemes BlueDot BlogLines co.mments Connotea del.icio.us de.lirio.us Digg Diigo DZone Facebook FeedMeLinks Folkd.com Fleck Furl Google Google Reader icio.de IndianPad Leonaut LinkaGoGo Linkarena Linkter Magnolia Mister Wong MyShare Ask.com MyStuff Ask.com Yahoo! MyWeb Netscape Netvouz Newsgator Newsvine Oneview.de RawSugar reddit Rojo Segnalo Shadows Simpy SlashDot Smarking Sphere Spurl Startaid StumbleUpon TailRank Technorati ThisNext yigg.de Webnews.de ReadMe.ru Dobavi.com Dao.bg Lubimi.com Ping.bg Pipe.bg Svejo.net Web-bg.com Plugin by Dichev.com
14 Jun 2009

Blackberry blank screen problem

Author: Adam | Filed under: Miscellaneous

A little tip for my fellow web designers. Some of you will already know how to do this, as it’s not overly complicated. However, some of you will not - for those people I hope this will be useful.

At the footer of most websites, you will have a copyright notice, along the lines of:

© Copyright 2009 TheMasterBrewer

Have you ever found it a nuisance having to update the year every January on all of your websites? I used to. But it’s actually very simple to make your websites automatically update themselves using a little nugget of PHP. Your web pages will of course have to be written in PHP if you use this method - basic HTML files (.htm or .html) or files coded in other languages (e.g. ASP, JSP, etc) won’t work.

So, what’s the code? You simply use the PHP date function to retrieve the current year. You can retrieve it in various formats, but the format we require is a four digit full numeric representation of the year. This is called using an uppercase ‘Y’. So, the code is simply:

date(’Y')

Simple, huh? You just echo this and it comes out as 2009, or whatever year it is. So, for the above copyright statement, your code would be:

&copy; Copyright <?php echo date(’Y'); ?> TheMasterBrewer

That’s it. The next time the clock strikes midnight on New Year’s Eve, all your websites will automatically update the year in their copyright notices.

Many of you will read this and think “duh”, but hopefully some of you will find it useful. If you have any questions, let me know. Cya!

Add This! Blinkbits Blinklist Blogmarks BlogMemes BlueDot BlogLines co.mments Connotea del.icio.us de.lirio.us Digg Diigo DZone Facebook FeedMeLinks Folkd.com Fleck Furl Google Google Reader icio.de IndianPad Leonaut LinkaGoGo Linkarena Linkter Magnolia Mister Wong MyShare Ask.com MyStuff Ask.com Yahoo! MyWeb Netscape Netvouz Newsgator Newsvine Oneview.de RawSugar reddit Rojo Segnalo Shadows Simpy SlashDot Smarking Sphere Spurl Startaid StumbleUpon TailRank Technorati ThisNext yigg.de Webnews.de ReadMe.ru Dobavi.com Dao.bg Lubimi.com Ping.bg Pipe.bg Svejo.net Web-bg.com Plugin by Dichev.com

I’ve just revamped one of the first websites I ever built. Domparison is a domain name price comparison website - it does exactly what it says on the tin (who remembers Ronseal?!), comparing prices for domain registration, renewal and transfers on various extensions.

One of the problems I originally had with the site was that some of the registrars list prices in USD (dollars), whereas others list prices in GBP (pounds). Originally, I listed the USD prices and GBP prices as they were and simply indicated what currency each price was. When I first made the website database-driven, around a year ago, I started listing all prices in USD. This meant that, in addition to having to periodically update all prices, I also had to frequently obtain the latest exchange rates and calculate the GBP prices in USD in order to update them. This was clearly quite a chore.

What I have done this time is written a PHP script that scrapes the latest exchange rates from Reuters. Using a cron job, this script automatically executes periodically on my server, fetching the latest exchange rates and automatically converting all the GBP prices in the database into USD.

The site has also had a bit of a face lift - I felt the previous design was a little cumbersome in the  look and feel department, so I have ditched the blue-based colour scheme and gone for a light grey one.

Next on my agenda is to create a mailing list so that users can be informed every time a mass price update takes place. I’m currently thinking I may go the whole hog and allow users to create accounts - then I could allow users to rate and review each registrar. If you have any other suggestions, let me know!

Hopefully my fellow domainers will find Domparison useful - and hopefully they will like the improvements I’ve made!

Add This! Blinkbits Blinklist Blogmarks BlogMemes BlueDot BlogLines co.mments Connotea del.icio.us de.lirio.us Digg Diigo DZone Facebook FeedMeLinks Folkd.com Fleck Furl Google Google Reader icio.de IndianPad Leonaut LinkaGoGo Linkarena Linkter Magnolia Mister Wong MyShare Ask.com MyStuff Ask.com Yahoo! MyWeb Netscape Netvouz Newsgator Newsvine Oneview.de RawSugar reddit Rojo Segnalo Shadows Simpy SlashDot Smarking Sphere Spurl Startaid StumbleUpon TailRank Technorati ThisNext yigg.de Webnews.de ReadMe.ru Dobavi.com Dao.bg Lubimi.com Ping.bg Pipe.bg Svejo.net Web-bg.com Plugin by Dichev.com
4 Jun 2009

Domparison: Domain Name Price Comparison

Author: Adam | Filed under: Domains, HCI, Websites

Just thought I would post a useful link I found today. My fellow web designers will appreciate this :)

While trying to find a nice shade of gold for a stylesheet, I decided to see if Google had any suggestions. One of the sites I found was this one:

http://cloford.com/resources/colours/500col.htm

It basically lists over 500 different colours and shades by name, along with Hex and RGB values for use in web/graphic design. The fact they are listed by name means you can do a CTRL+F to search for specific shades, such as “olive”, “cobalt”, etc.

Not the most powerful of tools but certainly a useful one that I’ve bookmarked for future reference!

Add This! Blinkbits Blinklist Blogmarks BlogMemes BlueDot BlogLines co.mments Connotea del.icio.us de.lirio.us Digg Diigo DZone Facebook FeedMeLinks Folkd.com Fleck Furl Google Google Reader icio.de IndianPad Leonaut LinkaGoGo Linkarena Linkter Magnolia Mister Wong MyShare Ask.com MyStuff Ask.com Yahoo! MyWeb Netscape Netvouz Newsgator Newsvine Oneview.de RawSugar reddit Rojo Segnalo Shadows Simpy SlashDot Smarking Sphere Spurl Startaid StumbleUpon TailRank Technorati ThisNext yigg.de Webnews.de ReadMe.ru Dobavi.com Dao.bg Lubimi.com Ping.bg Pipe.bg Svejo.net Web-bg.com Plugin by Dichev.com
3 Jun 2009

Colours listed by name with Hex and RGB values

Author: Adam | Filed under: CSS, Web Design, Websites